book now HomeCalendar Contact us US Office apply now
ACS International Schools
a passion for achievement
international community ACS 1999 Peace Prize Award

Peace Prize

   ACS 1999 Peace Prize Award
   Guest Speaker: Merle Lefkoff, Ph.D.

The New Faces of War, The New Faces of Peace

Hello students, parents, teachers and other honored guests. I'm going to talk about war and peace--but only for about 15 minutes! Tolstoy would not have recognized war or peace today. Soldiers around the world direct their weapons at civilians, and some of the most important peacemaking efforts today are the result of citizen diplomacy. In the future, the Internet will continue to change the faces of war and peace in astounding new ways.

I for one am glad to say goodbye to the waning twentieth century. Ah, yes, it has seen many wonders: the birth of new technology; the mixed blessing of global capitalism; the rise and collapse of communism; and the emergence of democracy as the universal basis for civil societies that legitimate and stabilize their governments.

The century that is passing has also known a frequency and intensity of war unlike any other in human history, even though warfare is as old as mankind. Every one of the states we live in today was wrenched out of violence and conquest. In the nineteenth century, the European regimental culture of a highly disciplined officer class--courageous, honorable, self-sacrificing, obedient to command--was a model for that century which was the most peaceful in European history. World War I ended all that.

World War I, a war of attrition in which 20,000,000 people died, the first war that many believe was about war for war's sake with commanding officers losing their purpose, was the beginning of our twentieth century nightmare in the West. Politics and shame and boundaries unresolved made World War II inevitable. In that war 50,000,000 people died! And by the war's end in 1945 a monstrous new dimension of warfare had entered our culture: shifting war against enemy soldiers, to war against enemy civilians. And lest we think only of Rwanda and Yugoslavia, I am reminded that horrific revelations of the massacre of South Korean women and children pinned under a railway bridge and mowed down with automatic weapons fire by American soldiers, under the command of their superiors, is just now coming to light in the U.S. forty years later.

The twin horrors of genocide and nuclear deterrence (which implies that if push comes to shove their will necessarily be unimaginable civilian casualties on all sides) has, I believe, caused us to recoil in terror from honest confrontation with the new faces of war. I have been forced to confront in my work as a mediator, and I am compelled to give witness.

THIS IS THE NEW FACE OF WAR.
From my Field Notebook, November 19, 1994. On the Ferry Jadrolinja from Split to Rijeka, Croatia. I wrote, "Oh, the horror and beauty of Mostar, Hercegovina. The city is destroyed now. We are having our negotiation meetings on the West Bank, the Croat side, but I crossed the front line last night to the Muslim East Bank to find Nadia. There is no electricity on the Muslim side. I found Nadia in her house. There was only one candle on the dining room table. Six other women were there. They are so very close to the surface with their emotions, and tears and weeping break out at the most unexpected moments. The situation is grim. There are many refugees from the Croat side, which is now completely "cleansed" of Serbs and Muslims.
" We walked outside and looked up at the fires of the Serb gun emplacements positioned high in a ring on the surrounding hillsides enabling the Serbs to shell the East Bank at random and at will. A few days ago a big shell hit a playground where there were 70 children. Two were killed, seven wounded. I wandered onto a side street where a patrol of Muslim children in gray police uniforms carrying automatic weapons almost as large as they stopped to give me a warning about a tank barrier they had set up at the front line. I talked my way through, determined to make my pilgrimage down to the river the historic bridge, the soul of the city that once was. The famous bridge is ironically more famous now that it has been destroyed after 500 years. The bridge and the skeletal mosque were eerie and achingly beautiful in the dark of the city. The night was perfectly clear and dry, and there was a full yellow moon blazing over the river. I knelt down on the river bank and cried and cried, witness to the destruction of a people and a culture."

THIS IS THE NEW FACE OF WAR.
An e-mail to me from Belgrade, July 12, 1999. I quote without editing: "Dear Merle, I feel joy at your letter and thank you because I know all American people are not aggressors. During the war I didn't work and therefore I didn't write you. In the beginning of the war, my brother and me have been going to my friends, in other town, for one month. The war was terrible! NATO bombed Pancevo Chemical industry and oil industry, what is a cause of ecology catastrophe. The ground, the water, the air are cancerous polluted. This widened until Sweden.

"Yugoslavia is destroyed, become poor, and people are become to know what has happen here. Karma works mercilessly, so Serbian people must bear responsibility for the wars in Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo, and for support to authoritative leader. NGOs actions didn't teach people here, but bombs maybe will. People in Serbia are rising up now. Also, I think NATO is as destructive and bad as Serbian war machine.
" I am thankful that we (family, friends) are still living. I told Dud and Julia about your letter. They send regards to you. I hear Meli and Aferdita have escaped Pristina and are safe in Macedonia, and it is good. You gave us seeds of vegetables and flowers when we were in New Mexico. It is many blossoms in my garden. With love, Marija."

Among the new faces of war in the twentieth century are civilian victims of genocide. They are Tutsis, Armenians, Jews, Roma, Cambodians, Bosnians, and East Timorese. They are NOT soldiers, and many--many, many--are women and children. And so the new faces of peace must deal with that reality.

THIS IS THE NEW FACE OF PEACE.
The International Committee of the Red Cross was founded in 1863 to treat wounded soldiers on the battlefield regardless--and this is important--regardless of what side they had fought on. Today, this NGO, or non-governmental organization, the oldest and perhaps most respected humanitarian organization in the world, treats women and children in refugee camps. Because they are "first in, and last out" in the world's hot spots (they are at work in 50 locations today), Red Cross workers are sometimes witness to and have intimate knowledge of war crimes as defined in the Geneva Conventions. If they give testimony at war crimes tribunals, they risk compromising their important neutrality, which will hinder their ability to give aid and comfort to victims in war zones. But they must respond to requests from international courts. What do they do? Do they give witness and risk their neutrality? The new face of peace is perplexity and moral dilemma.

THIS IS THE NEW FACE OF PEACE.
War Crimes Tribunals are laboring to bring the most evil faces of war to justice, which is the assignment of blame and punishment. Truth and Reconciliation Commissions are laboring not only to expose the perpetrators of civilian murder, but to enshrine the truth of what happened and seek forgiveness. In both of these processes there is an unbearable regurgitation of eyewitness and victim accounts of atrocities. I have come to believe that part of the healing process for the victims of war, the beginning point of new possibilities for peace and membership in civil society, is unflinching acknowledgement and confrontation as soon as possible, whether by truth telling or trial.

THIS IS THE NEW FACE OF PEACE.
There is a "New Diplomacy." Likely to be a United Nations peace keeper from Africa, or an American police chief teaching former soldiers how to be civilian police officers in the service of rebuilding their communities, or a young Dutchman who oversees hundreds of volunteers her personally recruits and trains to work in refugee camps to help people reenter a more peaceful future, or a Kosovar Albanian woman who started the Organization for Protection of Women and Children and who old-line diplomats are forced to include at the negotiating table as conditions for a civil society in Kosovo are hammered out. The too-often bloated, self-satisfied, and moribund institutions of formal diplomacy have embarrassed us in the past few years with their inability to prevent war. And so "citizen diplomacy" has taken on profound new meaning and real power as never before. And the training ground for the new diplomats is the NGO.

When Kofi Anan signed the Treaty that resulted from the International Campaign to Ban Land mines he referred to, and I quote, "the remarkable expression of the new diplomacy" that the land mine campaign expressed. Charles Clements, who led the organizing for the campaign and the Treaty and is a Nobel Peace Prize winner for his efforts, said recently, "The Campaign and the Treaty which resulted are suggestive of one of the profound shifts in modern human history...the concept of "human rights" has begun to transcend the concepts of nationhood and sovereignty that have dominated (in the past)....There is a vast sharing of power with NGOs today that has previously been at the core of sovereignty. In international fora, as with governments at home, NGOs were until recently relegated to hallways....NGOS worked through governments. All of that is rapidly changing. One thing that has made this shift in power from nation-states to NGOs possible is the information revolution."

And so it is with excitement and wonder that I introduce another new face of peace that is very young and infused with an idealism uncorrupted by the brutality of the past and not yet encumbered by cynicism. Young people have not in the past had the ability to empower themselves to be a force for peace, even as tens of thousands of little boys have been pressed into service as child soldiers around the world.

THIS IS THE NEW FACE OF PEACE.
A young man born in America, with a rich multi-cultural heritage, raised in India and passionate about world peace. And because of the power of the Internet, combined with the rising power of the New Diplomacy, this young man is not only making a difference now, but will continue to make a difference in the world struggles to come. A group of students from ACS Cobham have linked themselves to their friends in Namibia through the Internet to assure sustainability for their project. Charles Clements, who I quoted earlier, was of course talking about how the traditional power of sovereignty was rapidly becoming displace by the power of new networks, or "countries" of peace, built around the universal principles of human rights. And he was talking about our Peace Prize winners today.

One of the leaders of a global youth empowerment project, Nation1, Terah Ulrich deJong exemplified a future we can barely imagine. As we enter the twentyfirst century, he and his young colleagues, building new personal relationships through the Internet, will be leading our transition from one historical system to another.
I am hopeful that the terror of war and violence will be contained, as young women and men leaders gain access and power in the global dialogue on egalitarianism and democracy.

I am hopeful that the glorious attempt to live with differences will have more possibility for success as young women and men leaders gain access and power in the global dialogue on coexistence.

I am hopeful that the conscience and creativity needed to effect a more peaceful world be assured as young women and men leaders gain access and power in the global dialogue on humankind's freedom and God's will.

You have given me your respectful attention, and I thank you for that. I'd like to close with a quote from my favorite playwright turned politician, Vaclav Havel, because what we are facing in the next millennium is high drama to be sure. Havel was certainly in concert with the philosophy of the ACS International Schools when he wrote, "The main task in the coming era is...a radical renewal of our sense of responsibility. Our conscience must catch up to our reason; otherwise we are lost. It is my profound belief that there is only one way to achieve this: We must divest ourselves of...our habit of seeing ourselves as masters of the universe who can do whatever occurs to us....Our respect for other people, for other nations, and for other cultures, can only grow from an humble respect for the cosmic order and from and awareness that we are part of it."
Thank you all very much.

Back to Peace Prize Contest Back to Top

copyright 2005 ACS International designed by flipside powered by ignition
acs cobhamacs eghamacs hillingdon